Reshoring Initiative 2016 Data Report: The Tide Has Turned
This report contains data on trends in U.S. reshoring and FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) by companies that have returned U.S. production or sourcing from offshore. The data is cumulative 2010 through 2016 and is for the U.S. only, unless otherwise noted.
The combined reshoring and related FDI trends increased, adding 77,000 jobs in 2016, and a positive adjustment of 13,000 for the years 2010 thru 2015, bringing the total number of manufacturing jobs brought from offshore to over 338,000, since the manufacturing employment low of 2010.
Reshoring and FDI together were up over 10% in 2016, with much of the increase coming in November and December, presumably due to anticipation of greater U.S. competitiveness following the election. Similar to the last few years, FDI continued to exceed reshoring in terms of total jobs added, but reshoring increased at a higher rate than FDI from 2015 to 2016. Preliminary data from 2017 indicates similar trajectories, with an all-time high of reported jobs per month reported in January 2017.
Data Chart IndexReshoring Trends, Cumulative 2010-2016 Totals *
1. Reshored + FDI Manufacturing Jobs: The Tide Has Turned! – table
2. Reshored + FDI Manufacturing Jobs, cumulative 2010-2016
3. Reshoring + FDI by Tech Level, 2010-2016
4. Reasons Cited for Reshoring + FDI, 2010-2016
5. Reshoring + FDI by Industry, 2010-2016
6. Reshoring + FDI by Country from, 2010-2016
7. Reshoring + FDI by International Region From, 2010-2016
8. Reshoring + FDI Cases by State, 2010-2016
9. Reshoring + FDI by U.S. Region, 2010-2016
10. Nearshoring, Cumulative 2009-2017 Q1
11. Highlights from 2017 Q1 data_____________________ * The data for these reports comes from: the Reshoring Initiative’s Reshoring Library of over 4,000 published articles; privately submitted Reshoring Case Studies; and some other privately documented cases. Reshoring and FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) are both motivated by the same logic: the financial advantages the company achieves by producing near the customer. Cases must refer to a specific company, product and location to be included. We recognize cases when they are announced, assigning them to the current year unless implemented in a prior year. Probably, actual hiring lags 6 to 12 months behind the announcements. Job and company numbers are first tabulated and then adjusted for under-reporting, especially in the domestic supply chain. More information on our calculation process is available on request. Total job and company count will vary from chart to chart since we do not have data for all chart topics from all cases.
1. Reshored + FDI Manufacturing Jobs: First Positive Gain in Decades
In 2014 and 2015 parity was reached between offshoring and returning jobs, indicating that the net bleeding of manufacturing jobs to offshore had stopped. As of 2016, for the first time, probably since the 1970s, there was a net positive gain in U.S. jobs. The U.S. has gone from losing about 220,000 manufacturing jobs per year at the beginning of the last decade, to adding 30,000 jobs in 2016. Measured by our trade deficit, of about $500 billion/year, there are still 3 to 4 million U.S. manufacturing jobs offshore at current levels of U.S. productivity, representing a huge potential for U.S. economic growth.
We have found no sources that systematically track offshoring. Our offshoring estimates consider the changes in the level of imports, excluding petroleum. We encourage any sources of offshoring data to contact us: firstname.lastname@example.org.
2. Reshored + FDI Manufacturing Jobs, cumulative 2007-2016The rate of job announcements accelerated in 2016, tying the 2014 record. Most of the increase occurred in November and December, following the election.
3. Reshoring + FDI by Tech Level
It is generally agreed that high tech manufacturing jobs are more desirable than low-tech: more investment, more R&D, higher pay, less risk of loss to low wage countries, etc. However, we encourage the U.S. to become competitive on all tech levels to balance the trade deficit and employ a broader range of workers. Currently, reshoring and FDI are more prevalent in higher tech. There has been a recent uptick in low tech due to increases in apparel, wood, and plastics and rubber industries.
Tech level ratings are based on classifications derived from NSF: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/c6/c6s.htm#sb5 and OECD systems: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/revision-of-the-high-technology-sector-and-product-classification_134337307632).
4. Factors Cited for Reshoring + FDI*
Understanding the reasons other companies have given for reshoring helps companies to determine whether those reasons apply to them also.
The factors that influence reshoring and FDI are similar with the following exceptions. Reshoring places higher emphasis on Made in USA image, automation and re-design of the product. FDI places more emphasis on government incentives and skilled workforce. Since reshoring is almost all from low-wage countries, the companies have to minimize labor cost here to enable reshoring and can provide more perceived increase in value by offering Made in USA branding. Since most FDI is primarily from other developed countries, Made in USA is a less powerful sales argument. Shifting from Made in Germany to Made in the USA has less brand value than shifting from Made in China. Foreign companies can be recruited by all 50 states and often have larger projects, thus they receive more government incentives.
In 2016 skilled workforce was reported as a reason at a much higher rate than in previous years. The high ratings for skilled workforce are probably partly due to management wanting to recognize their team. It is also possible the rating is in comparison to developing country alternatives. Skilled workforce is receiving much needed attention and some improvements, but it is clear that our workforce recruiting and training are still not as effective as those in Germany, the source of much of the FDI.
Negative Factors are the negative issues experienced offshore. Most of the issues are related to distance: freight, delivery, inventory, etc. Others are country specific: rising wages, IP risk, political instability, etc. Positive Factors are the values that attracted the company to the U.S. and that they achieved here. Companies have consistently reported the positive domestic factors more often, probably because the companies place more value on demonstrating the wisdom of their current reshoring decision than on what went wrong with their earlier offshoring decision. Compared to last year, the factors cited with increased frequency were proximity to customers, skilled workforce, impact on domestic economy, and Walmart’s Made in USA initiative.
** Factors chart has been revised since original publication to reflect more complete data.
5. Reshoring + FDI by Industry
Only products that have been imported can be reshored. Thus, the products least suitable for offshoring never left, such as heavy, high volume minerals, high mix/low volume items or customized automation systems. The most active reshoring is by those that left and probably should not have done so, including machinery, transportation equipment and appliances.
The table below is primarily sorted by industry, as defined by three digit NAICs code. We also break out several active industries at the 4 and 5 digit levels. To get complete data at the three-digit level, add these industries into the relevant three-digit category. See the table below for details. As the data indicates, reshoring is focused on products whose size and weight suggest offshoring never offered great total cost savings.
This year, seven of our top ten industries match the list of seven Tipping Point Industries that Boston Consulting Group’s analytical studies projected to be reshored based on wage rates, productivity, total cost, etc. The three of the top-ten industries not included in the BCG study are: apparel, doing better than expected as retail tries to deal with stockouts and overstocks; chemicals which are driven by shale gas; and wood/paper products.
FDI is more heavily weighted towards transportation equipment because of the ongoing investment in automotive assembly plants and related suppliers. It also benefits the most from the government incentives.
In 2016, plastics and rubber moved ahead of fabricated metals; primary metals moved ahead of non-metallic minerals; medical equipment moved up 3 spots to #14; and furniture moved up 7 places to #10.
6. Reshoring + FDI by Country From
Reshoring is about 60% from China. FDI is heavily from Germany and Japan.
7. Reshoring + FDI by International Region From
Most reshoring is from Asia, most FDI is from Western Europe. Between 2015 and 2016, cumulative jobs from Asia increased by 29% and from Western Europe by 31%, basically consistent with overall changes.
8. Reshoring + FDI Cases by State
The Southeast and Texas get the most and, on average, the largest projects. The Midwest is second based on reshoring to its strong industrial base. Ohio moved up from #8 to #4 based on moves within the automotive and appliance industries, including Whirlpool and Fiat Chrysler. Alabama dropped from #5 to #8.
9. Reshoring + FDI by U.S. Region
10. NearshoringNearshoring from Asia to Mexico or Canada is better for the U.S. than work staying further offshore. For example, exports from Mexico to the U.S. have 40% U.S. content whereas exports from China have only 5% U.S. content. Transportation equipment and appliances are the most frequent industries to nearshore. Currently more companies nearshore to Mexico than to Canada due to greater cost advantages. Our data is not as complete for nearshoring, which is less often reported in U.S. news sources.
11. Highlights From 2017 First Quarter Data
Reshoring is still in the early stages of a decades long trend. The purpose of this report is to provide trend data, which should motivate companies to reevaluate their sourcing and siting decisions and make better decisions that consider all of the cost, risk and strategic impacts flowing from those decisions. FDI has continued to be stronger than reshoring. Both trends are based on the logic of localization: producing in or near the market.
2017 results will depend largely on actual policy changes (taxes, regulations, trade) implemented by the administration. The recent upswing in activity is in response to anticipation of such changes, which are expected to positively impact U.S. competitiveness. If and when the policy changes occur, reshoring and FDI will accelerate.
Other factors that will continue to influence jobs and the trade deficit include the strength of the U.S. dollar, relative to competitor countries. The strong USD and low oil prices hurt both trends, but probably hurt reshoring more than FDI as foreign companies act to increase their position in the strong U.S. market. In contrast, U.S. companies are still largely making sourcing decisions on an ex-works price basis. There is probably a 12-month lag time between these economic changes and a significant response in the trends. Balancing those headwinds, reshoring and FDI continue to gain credibility - companies are becoming more aware of TCO (Total Cost of Ownership), and skilled workforce recruitment and training are improving. In conclusion, we have moderate confidence that policy changes and increased use of TCO will balance low oil prices and high USD. Best guess forecast: 2017 reshoring and FDI will be flat to slightly up vs. 2016’s record level. We encourage readers to use our data and tools to help the U.S. improve on our forecast.
Supplements to this report will be published as they become available.Data refinement is ongoing.
- To see a full list of companies in the database click here.
- If your company is listed, email us to request your company’s data to review, edit and return. Please include your company name and detailed contact info.
- Companies, industry associations, states, EDOs and others are encouraged to send us information on reshoring and FDI cases. Send us links to articles and announcements, or go to the Reshoring Initiative’s database entry form.